Comments for Pop Bioethics http://www.popbioethics.com Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:17:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on Ergocalciferol! by jaffa http://www.popbioethics.com/2009/12/ergocalciferol/comment-page-1/#comment-901 jaffa Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:17:55 +0000 http://www.poptranshumanism.com/?p=1094#comment-901 This very comic was put on stumble via the actual SMBC site in 2009. Why would I need to stumble it again, via popbioethics? Pointless. I'll steer away from this site for the vague annoyance of having to deal with duplicate content on stumble. Which is -not- fun. This very comic was put on stumble via the actual SMBC site in 2009. Why would I need to stumble it again, via popbioethics? Pointless. I’ll steer away from this site for the vague annoyance of having to deal with duplicate content on stumble. Which is -not- fun.

]]> Comment on Ergocalciferol! by Chasky http://www.popbioethics.com/2009/12/ergocalciferol/comment-page-1/#comment-882 Chasky Mon, 21 Mar 2011 03:23:34 +0000 http://www.poptranshumanism.com/?p=1094#comment-882 It's got electrolytes! It’s got electrolytes!

]]> Comment on What Is Technology? by R. Gordon http://www.popbioethics.com/2011/03/what-is-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-880 R. Gordon Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:42:23 +0000 http://www.popbioethics.com/?p=2571#comment-880 It's beginning to look like a lot of large systems follow this pattern. Kelly's idea of evolving technology is much like the idea of evolving ideas--memes get a bit overhyped, but the underlying principle is sound. You're going to get this in any situation where something can be selected for replication and something else can be rejected, whether by the environment or by a particular organism. It’s beginning to look like a lot of large systems follow this pattern. Kelly’s idea of evolving technology is much like the idea of evolving ideas–memes get a bit overhyped, but the underlying principle is sound. You’re going to get this in any situation where something can be selected for replication and something else can be rejected, whether by the environment or by a particular organism.

]]> Comment on Steroids Are Not Bad by just right http://www.popbioethics.com/2010/01/steroids-are-not-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-875 just right Wed, 16 Mar 2011 04:10:29 +0000 http://www.poptranshumanism.com/2010/01/steroids-are-not-bad/#comment-875 steroid use for medium to long periods of time are dangerous for your long term health. Athletes should not have to worry about risking anymore than they already do for their profession, look up to them for it or not. maybe you should spend more time on the research and instead of just look up words to make yourself more secure in your argument however stupid it may be. you should have titled it "cocaine isn't bad" because thats about how relevant it is. steroid use for medium to long periods of time are dangerous for your long term health. Athletes should not have to worry about risking anymore than they already do for their profession, look up to them for it or not. maybe you should spend more time on the research and instead of just look up words to make yourself more secure in your argument however stupid it may be. you should have titled it “cocaine isn’t bad” because thats about how relevant it is.

]]> Comment on Ergocalciferol! by Dave http://www.popbioethics.com/2009/12/ergocalciferol/comment-page-1/#comment-854 Dave Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:18:22 +0000 http://www.poptranshumanism.com/?p=1094#comment-854 I always keep a shaker of ergocalciferol on hand because they never put enough in. I always keep a shaker of ergocalciferol on hand because they never put enough in.

]]> Comment on Ergocalciferol! by Kyle Munkittrick http://www.popbioethics.com/2009/12/ergocalciferol/comment-page-1/#comment-852 Kyle Munkittrick Sun, 06 Mar 2011 07:11:18 +0000 http://www.poptranshumanism.com/?p=1094#comment-852 Agreed, that is why it says SMBC above the comic hot-linked to the source. Re-post with attribution is publicity, not theft. Agreed, that is why it says SMBC above the comic hot-linked to the source. Re-post with attribution is publicity, not theft.

]]> Comment on Ergocalciferol! by SMBC http://www.popbioethics.com/2009/12/ergocalciferol/comment-page-1/#comment-851 SMBC Sun, 06 Mar 2011 02:29:49 +0000 http://www.poptranshumanism.com/?p=1094#comment-851 Thievery is frowned upon. Thievery is frowned upon.

]]> Comment on Slimy, Yet Satisfying by Eric Tatro http://www.popbioethics.com/2011/02/slimy-yet-satisfying/comment-page-1/#comment-827 Eric Tatro Sat, 19 Feb 2011 20:33:04 +0000 http://www.popbioethics.com/?p=2526#comment-827 I'd happily eat bugs - people do around the world, and I'm sure paleo-humans ate their fair share of insects, which would have been a great source of protein but require minimal calorie loss (as opposed to, say, hunting a mammoth). Besides, shrimp and lobster are delicious delicacies, and they're kind of like bugs of the sea. I’d happily eat bugs – people do around the world, and I’m sure paleo-humans ate their fair share of insects, which would have been a great source of protein but require minimal calorie loss (as opposed to, say, hunting a mammoth).

Besides, shrimp and lobster are delicious delicacies, and they’re kind of like bugs of the sea.

]]> Comment on Welcome to Pop Bioethics by Kyle Munkittrick http://www.popbioethics.com/2011/01/welcome-to-pop-bioethics/comment-page-1/#comment-810 Kyle Munkittrick Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:58:52 +0000 http://www.popbioethics.com/?p=2385#comment-810 Thanks for the welcome back, Ari! Good luck this year making your irrelevant and reactionary views palatable. Thanks for the welcome back, Ari! Good luck this year making your irrelevant and reactionary views palatable.

]]> Comment on Welcome to Pop Bioethics by Ari Schulman http://www.popbioethics.com/2011/01/welcome-to-pop-bioethics/comment-page-1/#comment-809 Ari Schulman Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:49:45 +0000 http://www.popbioethics.com/?p=2385#comment-809 Shouldn't the title then be "Pop and Bioethics"? Shouldn’t the title then be “Pop and Bioethics”?

]]>